Ethereum’s ongoing underperformance in opposition to Bitcoin has reignited debate over what’s holding the asset up, and who’s actually behind its demand.
In response to Bitcoin advocate Samson Mow, roughly $6 billion in South Korean retail cash is now propping up so-called Ethereum treasuries, corporations accumulating ETH as a balance-sheet asset echoing MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin technique. Mow issued the declare in an Oct. 5 post on X, arguing that “ETH influencers” have been flying to Seoul to courtroom retail merchants chasing the subsequent “technique play.”
In response to CoinMarketCap, as of Oct. 6, ETH has slipped about 1.9% up to now 24 hours and is down roughly 5% in opposition to Bitcoin over the previous month. That weak point, Mow urged, exposes how short-term retail enthusiasm, quite than institutional conviction, is sustaining Ethereum’s valuation.
Information from the Strategic ETH Reserve reveals that 67 entities, together with BitMine and SharpLink, collectively maintain about 5.49 million ETH (roughly $25 billion), or 4.5% of the overall provide.
Mow attributed a lot of this publicity to South Korean retail traders recognized domestically as seohak gaemie, claiming they’ve funneled round $6 billion into Ethereum treasury corporations. He argued that promoters have been advertising and marketing these corporations because the “subsequent MicroStrategy,” luring merchants searching for simple analogs to Bitcoin’s company accumulation playbook:
“Many of those traders have zero concept in regards to the ETH/BTC chart and suppose they’re shopping for the subsequent technique commerce.”
He warned that enthusiasm constructed on “monetary illiteracy” might backfire, particularly as Ethereum continues to lag behind Bitcoin in relative efficiency.
Ethereum’s value efficiency displays the priority. Regardless of periodic inflows and renewed narrative pushes, ETH has remained capped beneath its earlier all-time excessive of $4,946 and continues to weaken in opposition to Bitcoin. The ETH/BTC ratio has fallen by over 5% up to now 12 months, reinforcing the notion that a lot of the assist for Ethereum’s market cap is narrative-driven quite than primarily based on basic development or institutional adoption.
Mow’s critique aligns with feedback from Mechanism Capital co-founder Andrew Kang, who has additionally solid doubt on the monetary logic behind Ethereum-based treasuries. Kang pointed to initiatives like Tom Lee’s BitMine as examples of “undisciplined treasury fashions” that lack the monetary construction seen in profitable Bitcoin-holding corporations. “The technicals for Ethereum are bearish,” Kang mentioned, including that ETH’s long-term vary might stay between $1,000 and $4,800 and not using a main change in fundamentals.
Kang concluded that Ethereum’s valuation “comes primarily from monetary illiteracy,” evaluating its speculative momentum to XRP’s historic rallies. He argued that whereas retail hype can maintain a big market cap for a while, it’s not a sturdy base: “The valuation that may be derived from monetary illiteracy is just not infinite.”
Whether or not Korean retail demand turns into a brand new structural pillar for Ethereum, or the final gasp of a fading narrative, could rely on how lengthy the “ETH treasury” story can outrun the chart.
