Bitcoin For Companies (BFC), in coordination with its member firms, formally challenged MSCI’s proposed rule to exclude firms from the MSCI World Investable Market Indexes if digital property symbolize 50% or extra of complete property.
The rule would apply to firms whose major enterprise is classed as digital-asset treasury exercise.
BFC argues the proposal misclassifies working firms by prioritizing balance-sheet holdings over precise enterprise operations.
“MSCI has lengthy outlined firms by what they do, not by what they maintain. This proposal abandons that precept for a single asset class,” stated George Mekhail, managing director of BFC. “A shareholder-approved treasury choice shouldn’t override that actuality.”
The coalition recognized three structural points with the proposal. First, it redefines major enterprise based mostly on asset composition reasonably than revenue-generating operations. Second, it singles out digital property whereas different asset lessons face no comparable remedy.
Third, it ties index inclusion to unstable market costs, creating unpredictable membership adjustments.
BFC warned that the proposal might result in passive fund outflows, larger capital prices, and elevated volatility for firms, all unrelated to operational efficiency.
The group urged MSCI to withdraw the edge, keep an operations-based classification, guarantee asset-class neutrality, and have interaction with market individuals on a business-aligned framework.
Attempt echoes the sentiment
Attempt Asset Administration, co-founded by Vivek Ramaswamy, additionally formally urged MSCI final week to rethink its proposal to exclude firms with bitcoin holdings exceeding 50% of complete property from main fairness benchmarks.
In a letter to MSCI CEO Henry Fernandez, Attempt warned that the rule might produce inconsistent outcomes as a consequence of differing accounting requirements underneath U.S. GAAP and IFRS.
Attempt, the 14th-largest company bitcoin holder with over 7,500 BTC, argued that the 50% threshold is “unjustified, overbroad, and unworkable.” Its executives highlighted that many bitcoin treasury firms function actual companies in sectors corresponding to AI knowledge facilities, structured finance, and cloud infrastructure.
They in contrast the proposed remedy of bitcoin to different property, noting that vitality firms with giant oil reserves or gold miners are usually not excluded from indexes.
The agency additionally cited market volatility, derivatives publicity, and accounting variations as elements that might make index inclusion unpredictable.
Attempt warned that strict guidelines might drive innovation overseas, giving worldwide corporations a aggressive benefit.
MSCI plans to announce its choice on January 15, 2026. Attempt’s intervention reinforces the broader trade name for operations-based classification, asset-class neutrality, and truthful remedy of firms holding important bitcoin as a part of their treasury technique.
MSCI might exclude Technique
Maybe the corporate most affected by this may be Technique, the tech- and Bitcoin-focused software program firm well-known for its daring Bitcoin reserve technique. Technique and Chairman Michael Saylor recently pushed again in opposition to issues that MSCI could exclude the corporate from main fairness indices, which analysts warn would possibly set off billions in passive outflows.
Saylor emphasised that Technique just isn’t a fund or holding firm however an working enterprise with a $500 million software program division and a $7.7 billion Bitcoin-backed credit score program.
He highlighted merchandise like Stretch ($STRC), a Bitcoin-backed credit score instrument, and pressured that Technique actively creates, constructions, and operates monetary merchandise reasonably than passively holding property.
Disclaimer: Bitcoin For Companies And Bitcoin Journal each function underneath the dad or mum firm of BTC Inc.
