Copy-Paste L2s Are Hurting Ethereum’s Progress

Vitalik Buterin warns copy-paste Layer 2s and generic EVM chains are stalling Ethereum’s long-term scaling imaginative and prescient.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has stated that many new Layer 2 (L2) networks are repeating shallow design patterns, and warned that generic EVM chains with optimistic bridges are holding again significant progress.

His feedback lengthen the general public debate over whether or not right now’s L2 ecosystem nonetheless aligns with Ethereum’s unique scaling objectives.

No Extra “Copypasta” EVM Chains

In a February 5 put up on X, Buterin argued that consolation and familiarity, not technical necessity, are driving many L2 launches, resulting in copy-paste designs that add little past surface-level Ethereum compatibility.

The developer drew a comparability between infrastructure decisions and governance habits, writing that making yet one more EVM chain and including “an optimistic bridge to Ethereum with a one-week delay” has grow to be routine in the identical means forking Compound as soon as dominated DAO governance.

“That’s one thing we’ve carried out far an excessive amount of for a lot too lengthy, as a result of we received comfy, and which has sapped our creativeness and put us in a lifeless finish,” Buterin wrote.

He was much more direct about various designs that drop Ethereum bridges fully.

“For those who make an EVM chain with out an optimistic bridge to Ethereum, that’s even worse,” he stated, including, “We don’t friggin want extra copypasta EVM chains, and we positively don’t want much more L1s.”

Buterin insisted that Ethereum’s base layer is already scaling and can proceed so as to add EVM block house by means of 2026, although not with out limits. He famous that some workloads, comparable to AI-related functions, should still require decrease latency or specialised execution environments. In his view, these wants ought to push builders towards genuinely new architectures relatively than evenly modified replicas.

Matching “Vibes” With Actual Ethereum Connection

Buterin’s criticism builds on feedback he made earlier, suggesting many L2s not meet the unique definition of scaling Ethereum as a result of they fail to completely inherit its safety.

You might also like:

He argued that Ethereum not wants L2s to behave as branded shards, particularly contemplating mainnet charges are falling and fuel limits are rising.

In his newest put up, the 32-year-old confused that public positioning ought to replicate technical actuality. “Vibes have to match substance,” he wrote, criticizing initiatives that market themselves as tightly related to Ethereum whereas treating that hyperlink as an afterthought.

The blockchain’s co-founder outlined two fashions he considers affordable. One is an app chain that relies upon deeply on Ethereum, comparable to prediction markets that settle and handle accounts on the L1 whereas dealing with execution on a rollup. The opposite is what he referred to as “institutional L2s,” the place techniques like authorities registries publish cryptographic proofs on-chain for transparency, even when they don’t seem to be trustless or credibly impartial.

“For those who’re the very first thing, it’s legitimate and nice to name your self an Ethereum utility,” Buterin stated. “For those who’re the second factor, then you definitely’re not Ethereum… so you must simply say these issues straight.”