Ethereum has had a big growth in liquidity over the previous three months, with aggregated 2% market depth rising from $278.35 million on April 25 to $393.34 million on July 21.
This 41% enhance comes from a transparent buildup in resting orders on each side of the order ebook, suggesting heightened participation by market makers and a bigger buffer for risky buying and selling periods.
Nevertheless, the sharp spike in buying and selling exercise on July 21 compressed the depth-to-volume ratio to a multi-month low, pointing to rising however nonetheless restricted capability in absorbing fast-moving flows.
The bid/ask composition on July 21 confirmed a light tilt towards the promote facet, with $209.99 million in ask-side liquidity and $183.35 million on the bid facet throughout the 2% vary. Whereas not dramatically imbalanced, the $26.64 million hole hints at cautious upward resistance, probably as a consequence of profit-taking or hedging conduct following Ethereum’s latest rally.
Extra notably, US-based exchanges now account for 50.29% of world 2% market depth, regaining parity with offshore platforms.
This marks a shift from April, when US platforms fell barely beneath the 50% threshold. Kraken and CEX.IO had been the first drivers of this transfer, holding 31.2% and 29.97% of the US market share, respectively, whereas Coinbase trailed with simply 18.54%. Coinbase’s decline in depth share might stem from latest changes to its price construction, which have reportedly diminished market maker incentives.
On the worldwide facet, Binance retained its dominance with 44.53% of all 2% ETH liquidity, adopted by Bitfinex at 12.64% and OKX at 12.59%. Whereas Binance continues to function the market’s central liquidity hub, its share has slipped barely in latest weeks. Bitfinex and OKX have gained modest floor, reflecting a gradual redistribution of liquidity throughout high-frequency buying and selling venues.
Regardless of this shift, Binance stays the most well-liked venue for Ethereum buying and selling by far. On July 21, Binance processed 47.24% of whole centralized change (CEX) spot ETH quantity, equal to roughly $7.08 billion of the day’s $15.00 billion whole. Crypto.com and Bybit adopted at 12.55% and seven.59%, respectively, with Coinbase dealing with simply 5.87% of the worldwide CEX circulate.
The hole between market depth and precise quantity was most evident within the context of July 21’s buying and selling. Spot quantity surged to $15.00 billion, up from $5.36 billion on June 25 and simply $4.15 billion in Might. This adopted a modest growth in 2% depth (from $330.69 million to $393.34 million), compressing the depth-to-volume ratio from 6.2% to 2.6%.
In sensible phrases, this implies the order ebook turned comparatively thinner in comparison with the scale of circulate it wanted to soak up, rising the danger of slippage had the buying and selling continued into lower-liquidity zones.
The sharp drop within the depth-to-volume ratio on July 21 exhibits how market exercise can rapidly outpace order ebook growth, even when liquidity seems to be rising. It additionally highlights the boundaries of book-based metrics when confronted with risky or event-driven flows.
In terms of decentralized exchanges, DEX buying and selling volumes stay comparatively stagnant. On July 21, DEXs processed simply $699.51 million (about 4.5% of the day’s CEX quantity), regardless of the general surge in exercise. This ratio has barely modified since April, when DEX volumes stood at $309.78 million versus $5.79 billion in CEX circulate. Whereas on-chain buying and selling stays standard amongst retail and arbitrage segments, giant individuals proceed to depend on centralized venues as a consequence of higher execution ensures and decrease friction prices.
Curiously, the ETH/USD worth on Binance traded between $3,703 and $3,859 on July 21, closing at $3,764. This 4.2% intraday transfer is comparatively contained given the almost $15 billion in spot turnover. It means that the expanded order ebook depth did play a task in dampening volatility, even amid heightened exercise. Ethereum noticed a 6.1% intraday swing throughout an identical quantity occasion in mid-Might, when order ebook depth was considerably thinner.
We will draw a number of necessary conclusions concerning the market primarily based on this information. First, whereas market depth is bettering in absolute phrases, the hole between liquidity and real-time quantity remains to be huge throughout peak periods. Second, the shift in depth share towards US venues alerts doable market maker repositioning in anticipation of a extra favorable regulatory stance or evolving operational constraints overseas. Third, Binance’s function as a liquidity and execution venue stays structurally necessary. Whilst depth redistributes, its unmatched commerce volumes affect worth discovery.
Lastly, the relative weak point of DEX volumes highlights persistent structural limitations to broader adoption. These embrace gasoline charges, slippage tolerance, and latency points, all challenges that stay unresolved regardless of the expansion of L2s and routing aggregators.
General, Ethereum’s liquidity profile exhibits materials progress, significantly in resting order depth and venue diversification. But the ecosystem continues to rely closely on just a few dominant gamers for each liquidity and quantity.
The submit Ethereum order‑book liquidity has grown 41 % since April appeared first on CryptoSlate.
