Close Menu
    Trending
    • Circle Says Stablecoin Infrastructure Updates to Spur Use
    • Solana (SOL) Crashes Back To $112, A Level That Could Decide Everything
    • Here’s Why The Ethereum Validator Network Is So Strong
    • Crypto Market Structure Bill Passes Through Senate Committee
    • SEC Sets Clear Rules for Tokenized Securities, Splitting Them Into Two Key Categories
    • 21Shares Lists JitoSOL-Backed Solana ETP in Europe
    • Solana Scores Major Institutional Adoption As WisdomTree Goes On-Chain
    • Ethereum Is Pivoting Into The AI Industry? Here’s What We Know So Far
    CryptoGate
    • Home
    • Bitcoin News
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Crypto Market Trends
    • Altcoins
    • Ethereum
    • Blockchain
    • en
      • en
      • fr
      • de
      • it
      • ja
    CryptoGate
    Home»Altcoins»MSCI Review Puts Digital Asset Treasury Companies Under Pressure
    Altcoins

    MSCI Review Puts Digital Asset Treasury Companies Under Pressure

    CryptoGateBy CryptoGateNovember 21, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Digital asset treasury firms may face “significant strain” if the inventory market index MSCI decides to exclude them in January, in keeping with an analyst, who advised Cointelegraph that that is probably.

    The MSCI Index announced in October that it was consulting with the funding neighborhood about whether or not to exclude Bitcoin (BTC) and different digital asset treasury companies (DATs) which have a steadiness sheet with greater than 50% crypto belongings. 

    A number of the suggestions has been that DATs can “exhibit traits just like funding funds, that are at present not eligible for index inclusion,” in keeping with the MSCI. 

    Talking to Cointelegraph, Charlie Sherry, Head of Finance at Australian crypto change BTC Markets, mentioned in his view, the chances of the MSCI excluding DATs are “solidly in favour of it,” because the index “solely places adjustments like this into session once they’re already leaning that manner.”

    The session is open till Dec. 31, with the conclusion to be made public on Jan. 15 subsequent 12 months, and any ensuing adjustments coming into pressure throughout February. 

    Enter can be being sought about whether or not further parameters ought to be thought of, corresponding to if an organization defines itself as a DAT, or has raised capital primarily to accumulate crypto.

    If the MSCI decides to exclude DATs, Sharry mentioned index-tracking funds would want to promote, and that alone creates significant strain on the affected names.

    A preliminary record notes 38 crypto firms on MSCI’s radar, together with Michael Saylor’s Strategy, Sharplink Gaming, and crypto miners Riot Platforms and Marathon Digital Holdings, amongst others. 

    The MSCI lists not less than 38 crypto firms that could possibly be affected by its resolution. Supply: MSCI

    “When many of the worth comes from a balance-sheet asset quite than the underlying enterprise, MSCI treats that as outdoors the scope of a conventional fairness benchmark,” Sherry mentioned. “It’s a risk-management resolution designed to maintain indexes aligned with predictable enterprise fundamentals.”

    “This additionally marks a shift in tone from the previous 12 months. Crypto-heavy company methods have been applauded as a capital markets innovation. Now the big index suppliers are tightening their definitions, and it reveals that the market is shifting out of its every part is adoption section and again towards a extra conservative filter.”

    A Wednesday observe from JPMorgan analysts warned that Technique may shed $2.8 billion
    if the MSCI strikes forward, and roughly $9 billion of its estimated $56 billion market worth is sitting in passive funds tracked by indexes, Bloomberg reports.

    Supply: Matthew Sigel

    Unclear if different indexes may comply with swimsuit

    Sherry mentioned it’s “arduous to name at this stage” if the MSCI’s resolution would affect different index suppliers.

    “Index suppliers usually watch one another’s strikes, however they don’t all the time transfer in lockstep. S&P’s therapy of MicroStrategy reveals there’s precedent for taking a stricter view, but every supplier has its personal methodology and shopper base to contemplate,” he mentioned.

    Associated: Strategy steps up Bitcoin buys with 8,178 BTC purchase

    “If MSCI makes a change, it may open the door for others to assessment their very own guidelines, however it doesn’t assure a series response.”

    Technique nonetheless seems on track for possible inclusion in the S&P 500, in keeping with crypto market intelligence firm 10X Analysis, which additionally predicted in October that there was a 70% probability it will be added to the index earlier than the top of the 12 months.

    Clearer guidelines are good for crypto

    In the meantime, Sherry additionally mentioned, clearer guidelines round company classification finally assist the area.