Solidity 0.6.x features: try/catch statement

The try/catch syntax introduced in 0.6.0 is arguably the most important leap in error dealing with capabilities in Solidity, since cause strings for revert and require had been launched in v0.4.22. Each attempt and catch have been reserved key phrases since v0.5.9 and now we are able to use them to deal with failures in exterior operate calls with out rolling again the entire transaction (state adjustments within the known as operate are nonetheless rolled again, however the ones within the calling operate are usually not).

We’re shifting one step away from the purist “all-or-nothing” method in a transaction lifecycle, which falls wanting sensible behaviour we regularly need.

Dealing with exterior name failures

The attempt/catch assertion lets you react on failed exterior calls and contract creation calls, so you can not use it for inner operate calls. Observe that to wrap a public operate name throughout the identical contract with attempt/catch, it may be made exterior by calling the operate with this..

The instance beneath demonstrates how attempt/catch is utilized in a manufacturing unit sample the place contract creation would possibly fail. The next CharitySplitter contract requires a compulsory deal with property _owner in its constructor.

pragma solidity ^0.6.1;

contract CharitySplitter {
    deal with public proprietor;
    constructor (deal with _owner) public {
        require(_owner != deal with(0), "no-owner-provided");
        proprietor = _owner;
    }
}

There’s a manufacturing unit contract — CharitySplitterFactory which is used to create and handle cases of CharitySplitter. Within the manufacturing unit we are able to wrap the new CharitySplitter(charityOwner) in a attempt/catch as a failsafe for when that constructor would possibly fail due to an empty charityOwner being handed.

pragma solidity ^0.6.1;
import "./CharitySplitter.sol";
contract CharitySplitterFactory {
    mapping (deal with => CharitySplitter) public charitySplitters;
    uint public errorCount;
    occasion ErrorHandled(string cause);
    occasion ErrorNotHandled(bytes cause);
    operate createCharitySplitter(deal with charityOwner) public {
        attempt new CharitySplitter(charityOwner)
            returns (CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter)
        {
            charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
        } catch {
            errorCount++;
        }
    }
}

Observe that with attempt/catch, solely exceptions occurring contained in the exterior name itself are caught. Errors contained in the expression are usually not caught, for instance if the enter parameter for the new CharitySplitter is itself a part of an inner name, any errors it raises is not going to be caught. Pattern demonstrating this behaviour is the modified createCharitySplitter operate. Right here the CharitySplitter constructor enter parameter is retrieved dynamically from one other operate — getCharityOwner. If that operate reverts, on this instance with “revert-required-for-testing”, that won’t be caught within the attempt/catch assertion.

operate createCharitySplitter(deal with _charityOwner) public {
    attempt new CharitySplitter(getCharityOwner(_charityOwner, false))
        returns (CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter)
    {
        charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
    } catch (bytes reminiscence cause) {
        ...
    }
}
operate getCharityOwner(deal with _charityOwner, bool _toPass)
        inner returns (deal with) {
    require(_toPass, "revert-required-for-testing");
    return _charityOwner;
}

Retrieving the error message

We are able to additional prolong the attempt/catch logic within the createCharitySplitter operate to retrieve the error message if one was emitted by a failing revert or require and emit it in an occasion. There are two methods to attain this:

1. Utilizing catch Error(string reminiscence cause)

operate createCharitySplitter(deal with _charityOwner) public {
    attempt new CharitySplitter(_charityOwner) returns (CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter)
    {
        charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
    }
    catch Error(string reminiscence cause)
    {
        errorCount++;
        CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter = new
            CharitySplitter(msg.sender);
        charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
        // Emitting the error in occasion
        emit ErrorHandled(cause);
    }
    catch
    {
        errorCount++;
    }
}

Which emits the next occasion on a failed constructor require error:

CharitySplitterFactory.ErrorHandled(
    cause: 'no-owner-provided' (sort: string)
)

2. Utilizing catch (bytes reminiscence cause)

operate createCharitySplitter(deal with charityOwner) public {
    attempt new CharitySplitter(charityOwner)
        returns (CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter)
    {
        charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
    }
    catch (bytes reminiscence cause) {
        errorCount++;
        emit ErrorNotHandled(cause);
    }
}

Which emits the next occasion on a failed constructor require error:

CharitySplitterFactory.ErrorNotHandled(
  cause: hex'08c379a0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000116e6f2d6f776e65722d70726f7669646564000000000000000000000000000000' (sort: bytes)

The above two strategies for retrieving the error string produce an identical outcome. The distinction is that the second technique doesn’t ABI-decode the error string. The benefit of the second technique is that additionally it is executed if ABI decoding the error string fails or if no cause was supplied.

Future plans

There are plans to launch assist for error sorts that means we can declare errors in an identical solution to occasions permitting us to catch completely different sort of errors, for instance:

catch CustomErrorA(uint data1) { … }
catch CustomErrorB(uint[] reminiscence data2) { … }
catch {}