ZachXBT Warns AscendEX Users of Potential Liquidity Issues and Delayed Withdrawals

On-chain evaluation reportedly discovered restricted holdings of main property, elevating considerations in regards to the trade’s liquidity.

ZachXBT says AscendEX customers are experiencing withdrawal delays, with some requests not being processed in any respect.

A number of people reported that the transactions have been stalled for days, generally even weeks.

AscendEX Customers Report Withdrawal Points

The on-chain sleuth issued a warning in his Telegram group, alerting members to potential liquidity challenges.

“I’ve noticed a number of reviews that the centralized trade AscendEX (previously Bitmax) is delaying consumer withdrawals for days/weeks or not processing withdrawals,” he wrote.

After reviewing Arkham and TRM for recognized sizzling wallets, ZachXBT has noticed that the trade’s reserves appear to be missing the large-cap tokens like USDT, ETH, and SOL. This means that the platform is sort of more likely to have some liquidity issues. He additionally offered some Solana, Tron, and EVM pockets addresses used within the investigation.

Based on group reviews, customers who’ve tried to maneuver funds out of AscendEX have seen their transactions caught in “initiating” for over every week.

On Reddit, one consumer described their expertise, stating that the withdrawals don’t even produce a transaction ID. Their funds had been debited from their out there steadiness and at the moment are locked with none clarification from the platform, they stated.

For its half, the trade is reportedly but to supply any significant help or explanations throughout its assist channels and has additionally not issued any public response to the considerations.

You might also like:

AscendEX, previously often called Bitmax, was based by George Cao and Ariel Ling in 2018. North Korea’s Lazarus Group hacked the platform in December 2021 for $78 million.

ZachXBT Flags JuCoin Reserves Amid Withdrawal Issues

This isn’t the primary time an trade has confronted scrutiny over transaction processing delays. ZachXBT lately flagged JuCoin for comparable issues, alleging that its reserves usually are not backed by liquid property.

The blockchain detective questioned JuCoin’s reported $511 million reserves, saying most of this gave the impression to be tied to USDC and USDT issued on its JuChain with out clear backing. He additionally challenged the publicly listed group, saying that the challenge appeared to be out of their management, however the group responded, saying the disruptions had been brought on by ongoing upgrades and restructuring.

Nevertheless, affected customers continued to ask for clear timelines, transparency, and assurance that their property can be found for switch.

Attackers have additionally exploited JuDAO for $225,000 in April and a $20 million incident final 12 months. In the meantime, the East Asian trade has rebranded a number of instances up to now.